Greenfield
Factory Automation
Bassett
Batch Processing
Hand
Process Automation
Reynolds
Packaging Automation
Campbell
On the Edge
Download this free 97-page Batch Process Playbook loaded with industry expert advice on topics ranging from control systems, instrumentation, and industrial networks to energy management, security, and system upgrades.
Feature Article
|

Motion: How to Decide When to Distribute Control

Print Reprint
FILED IN:  Motion Control, Packaging, OEM
     
Although automation vendors tend to urge users to consider decentralizing drives and distributing as much intelligence as possible throughout their machinery, most readily admit that it’s not for every application. The centralized approach is still valid for many applications.

The natural question to ask is, how does one go about making a decision? Here is some advice from Tom Jensen, technology evangelist at Lenze Americas Corp.

• Start with a white sheet of paper. “Don’t copy and paste code and concepts for new mechatronic machines,” advises Jensen. “Copying old concepts locks you into old hardware concepts.”

• Think functionality. Ask, what does the machine need to do? In general, complex motion tends to benefit the most from centralized control. “If the machine can be simplified, gains might be realized with remote motor-mounted frequency drives,” notes Jensen.

• Consider the machine’s footprint. Small machines with short cable runs normally have a cabinet.

• Count the motors. “A low motor count works against decentralized drives,” says Jensen. “Generally, decentralized motion control is great for a single axis, but syncing multiple axes requires programming and wiring between controllers that can be done easily in a centralized controller.”

An example of an application that can benefit from distributed drives is the machinery used in warehouses and distribution centers. These facilities can have more than 12,000 motors and drives actuating various palletizing and wrapping machines, conveyors, automated storage-and-retrieval units, and robots.

“A traditional motor would have a cabinet-mounted motor control device, such as soft start, breaker or drive,” says Jensen. “Such solutions would prove to be more costly and hard to maintain because of the motor structure.”

For this reason, he and his colleagues work with manufacturers of warehouse equipment to reduce the size of motor-control centers by installing motor-mounted induction drives. Driving many motors with one three-phase power supply can greatly reducing the branch protection needed to support a line, according to Jensen. Distributing drives and daisy chaining motors also can reduce the need for cabinet and cable by as much as 80 percent, he says.

>> Read Automation World's complete coverage, "Decentralized Motion, Driven by Intelligence"

COMPANIES IN THIS ARTICLE: Lenze Americas

ADVERTISEMENT
0

Add new comment

 

  NEWSLETTERS
Don’t miss intelligence crucial to your job and business!
Click on any newsletter to view a sample. Enter your email address below to sign up!

News Insights

News & Analysis

Product Insights

Latest Automation Products

Best of Blogs

Industrial Automation Columnists

Automation Focus

Sponsored white papers, videos and products

Continuous Processing

Oil & Gas, Chemical and More

Automation Skills

Improve Industry Skills

Industrial
Ethernet Review

Network Application of IE

Factory Automation

Technology for Discrete Manufacturing

Food Bev & Pharma

Automation Applications & Trends

Global Edition

Global automation news

Each newsletter ranges in frequency from once per month to a few times per month at most.

 

The best of the essentials!
Secrets to Automation Project Success

Sign up to receive timely updates from our editors and download this FREE Automation Project Survival Guide. It’s packed with field-tested best practices from industry experts that can help make your next automation project a success.

x