Don't Rip Out Your Old Automation Just Yet
Don't Rip Out Your Old Automation Just Yet
By contrast, “rip-and-replace strategies involve a radical step-change and provide the user with a one-time improvement,” he continues. “These strategies require large capital-budget investments and, most likely, result in major disruptions and risk to production.” He thinks that the costs usually outweigh the benefits.
To avoid the chaos and expense associated with such shocks, systems integrator Industrial Concepts Inc., of Hartsville, S.C., helped Erachem to develop and implement the much tamer evolution strategy. The plan called for laying ABB’s 800xA extended automation control technology on top of the installed System Six distributed control system (DCS). Besides installing seven Internet protocol (IP) video cameras for remote monitoring, the first phase entailed putting a Profibus card in one of the control units, adding about 150 S800 input/output (I/O) modules, and attaching them to the Profibus card to replace the outdated distributed I/O.
Easy does it
So that Erachem could begin getting used to the new software, Industrial Concepts added the two main servers, an engineering workstation and an operator workplace in the second phase, as well as eight more video cameras. In Phase Three, the integrator added redundant servers, four more operator workplaces, a second Profibus card, and approximately 150 more S800 I/O modules. “They also put in an AC800M controller and an S800 I/O unit,” reports Randy Wimberly, Erachem’s information systems manager.
The fourth phase completed the plan. “Our evolution was executed with zero downtime, while providing us with the added functionality we need to be competitive,” says Wimberly. This includes tightening quality controls and managing costs.
Inergy Services solved a similar upgrade problem in a different way at its fractionation facility in Tupman, Calif., just outside Bakersfield. Like Erachem’s Johnsonville plant, this facility also was running up against the limitations of its old DCS. The difference was that its DCS would not support the forecasted growth of the facility, and limited the amount of information that the company could extract from the instrumentation and I/O devices. The maintenance and expansion of the DCS, moreover, was extremely expensive.
“The DCS at the time was built upon 4-to-20-milliamp (mA) transmitter signals, and I/O that was tied together with analog cards,” explains Phil Sanders, instrumentation and electronics supervisor at Inergy Services at the time of the upgrade. He is currently a senior automation engineer for Contra Costa Electric Inc. (CCE), in Bakersfield, a consultant that helped with the upgrade and continues to offer maintenance services. “We felt that we could get a lot more data from the I/O if we used communications protocols like Modbus and Hart (highway-addressable remote transducer).”
The chief challenge was linking the disparate instrumentation, I/O devices and communications platforms in the plant. To get the necessary infrastructure, Sanders and his colleagues selected a hybrid solution based upon Allen-Bradley ControlLogix programmable automation controllers (PACs) from Rockwell Automation Inc., Milwaukee. “It seemed to be the easiest and most cost-effective way to tie in multiple communications networks into our existing platform and to gather ...









Comments(0)
Add new comment