The Great Safety Debate: Page 5 of 5

The Great Safety Debate

Print

the same engineering software for both, that means you need to have your control system software also scrutinized by TÜV, because you must be sure that it can’t feed back into the safety system,” de Breet says. So Yokogawa chose to go with TÜV-certified engineering software that is separate from that used for control system engineering, he notes.

At Honeywell Process Solutions, Hillman agrees that separation of control engineering software from safety engineering software is the way to go. A problem with common engineering software, he says, involves human error. A common engineering software approach puts the onus on the end-user to make sure that safety and control functions are segregated, and that those functions act independently if they fail, according to Hillman, who is based in ’s-Hertogenbosch, The Netherlands.

That’s why Honeywell relies on separate Safety Builder and Control Builder engineering software for use by customers who are linking the company’s current flagship safety controller, the Safety Manager, with the current flagship process controller, the C300, under the company’s Experion umbrella, Hillman says. In line with Honeywell’s reading of the international safety standards, this approach relies on separate and diverse processors that are linked in a way that provides “operational integration with secure data access, but no common failure modes,” as Hillman puts it. He believes that some of Honeywell’s competitors “have gone too far overboard on the integration side.”

How fast?

Going forward, the debate over separate vs. integrated safety/control systems appears certain to continue, even as integrated systems gain a greater foothold in the market. The issue may come down to the degree of integration with which each individual end-user feels comfortable.

“At ARC, we say that this new class of safety systems offers different degrees of same but separate,” says Dave Woll, ARC vice president, consulting, for the process industries. “Our feeling from talking to end-users is that the attractiveness of these systems comes from their significantly lower cost of ownership. There’s no question that the market is moving toward different degrees of same but separate,” Woll adds. “The big question is, ‘How fast is it going to move?’ ”          

 

For more information, search keywords “ process safety ” at www.automationworld.com.

.

Pages

Comments(0)

Add new comment

By submitting this form, you accept the Mollom privacy policy.

Follow Us

 

 

  NEWSLETTERS

Don’t miss intelligence crucial to your job and business!
Click on any newsletter to view a sample. Enter your email address below to sign up!

News Insights

News & Analysis

Product Insights

Latest Automation Products

TalkPoints

Automation Columnists

Feed Forward

Latest from Gary Mintchell

Automation Focus

Sponsored white papers, videos and products

Process Automation

Industry Trends & Applications

Motion Control

Machine & Motion Control

Automation Skills

Improve Industry Skills

Industrial
Ethernet Review

Network Application of IE

Packaging
Automation Review

Trends in Packaging Automation

Safety
Automation Insights

The How & Why of Safety

Each newsletter ranges in frequency from once per month to a few times per month at most.
Feedback Form