Security and Safety Follow Parallel Paths: Page 4 of 4

Security and Safety Follow Parallel Paths

Print
Boudreaux. “But I think security is likely to move faster than safety did.”

Ditto for Eric Byres, chief technology officer at Byres Research, now part of exida. Byres says he has noticed a recent change lately in the pace of cyber-security standards development. “ISA99 has really started to get a head of steam behind it. There’s more rigor going into the way that security standards are being developed there, and I think that’s because of this transfer of good safety practices into security,” he ventures.

For his part, Byres says he even expects to see some “new mathematical techniques” developed to deal more effectively with some of the vagaries of the cyber-security field. “All of the math in the safety world is very probabilistic,” he notes, an approach that won’t work with security. But by borrowing from other fields—maybe computer software and aviation, for example—security practitioners may be able to develop better mathematical models for looking at control-system cyber threats, Byres believes. “It’s not just simply taking everything from safety and applying it directly to security. We have to modify it to make
it work.”

No matter what the ultimate outcome, current efforts to more closely model and align cyber security with well-established functional safety standards and practices are nearly certain to produce positive results, concludes Eric Cosman, engineering solutions information technology (IT) consultant at The Dow Chemical Co., in Midland, Mich., who co-chairs the ISA99 committee with Singer.

“I don’t claim to be a definitive expert in that area, but I do know that there are people like Bryan [Singer] and others who are determined to press this concept as far as it will possibly go,” says Cosman. “And there are other people who are skeptical about how far we’ll be able to go with this, because unlike with safety, you can’t statistically predict what a determined adversary is going to do.”

But Cosman says he is personally unconcerned with all of that. One of the biggest benefits, he believes, will come from engaging safety experts and taking advantage of all that they’ve learned during the past 10 to 20 years. “As we engage them, we as an industry will find out how far this model will take us, as applied to security,” Cosman notes. “And even if we run into a brick wall down the road, we’re still going to be further ahead than we are today.”

For more on cyber security and safety, see “Cyber Security = Safety. Get It?” at www.automationworld.com/feature-5823.

Subscribe to Automation World's RSS Feeds for Feature Articles

Pages

Comments(0)

Add new comment

By submitting this form, you accept the Mollom privacy policy.

Follow Us

 

 

  NEWSLETTERS

Don’t miss intelligence crucial to your job and business!
Click on any newsletter to view a sample. Enter your email address below to sign up!

News Insights

News & Analysis

Product Insights

Latest Automation Products

TalkPoints

Automation Columnists

Feed Forward

Latest from Gary Mintchell

Automation Focus

Sponsored white papers, videos and products

Process Automation

Industry Trends & Applications

Motion Control

Machine & Motion Control

Automation Skills

Improve Industry Skills

Industrial
Ethernet Review

Network Application of IE

Packaging
Automation Review

Trends in Packaging Automation

Safety
Automation Insights

The How & Why of Safety

Each newsletter ranges in frequency from once per month to a few times per month at most.
Feedback Form