Isolationism, Cultured Staffs Help Protect Networks: Page 3 of 3

Feature Article
|

Isolationism, Cultured Staffs Help Protect Networks

Print

Calif.

 

 

Companies can also use these passwords to establish a tiered structure for human access. Many companies give most employees similar access levels, but that’s often not the best approach. “Passwords are about authorization for what you can and cannot do, like applying domain policies that determine things like who can upload or download programs,” says Rockwell’s Lewins.

 

 

Alternatively, companies can restrict personnel to specific systems or limit the ways they can communicate. “We limit people to certain computers and protocols,” says Davis, at Opto 22. He notes that as a way to provide additional security, the server automatically records everyone who accesses control programs.

 

 

While controlling people’s access is a big aspect of security, many companies do their best to automate communications so that people aren’t involved unless their decision-making input is required. “Machine-to-machine communications are easier, since the machines always follow procedure. They make sure they only send and accept messages from authorized equipment,” says Shayegani, at Lantronix.

 

 

Insider information

 

Another aspect of dealing with the human element is to safeguard software. Proprietary programming is often a big element in a company’s portfolio, so making sure it isn’t compromised is a key element for success.

 

 

“OEMs (original equipment manufacturers) and large customers want to protect their intellectual property. The machines can be duplicated fairly easily, but the code behind them is not nearly as easy to duplicate,” Lewins says.

 

 

Here, internal problems are most likely to cause problems. A key issue is to make sure that the critical software that turns a standard piece of equipment into an efficient tool for the company’s products isn’t altered by someone who wants to tweak a step. “You want to protect your code from well-intentioned employees. You don’t want someone altering code, since it rarely causes problems,” Lewins says.

 

 

A related aspect is to provide ways to make sure that maintenance personnel and operators know which piece of equipment they’re working on. In complex networked systems, it’s easy to alter the wrong machine. “People need ways to make sure they’re not altering production line 1 when they actually want to alter line 2,” Lewins says. Restricting employees only to equipment they know is important to avoid this type of accident, he adds.

 

 

Blending all these technologies and human factors into a coherent strategy isn’t a challenge that’s going to be solved overnight. IT managers must be called in, along with other groups, to create a cohesive approach. Suppliers provide some help, but their aids can’t be considered light reading. “We’ve got a 200-page configuration manual that explains the steps for setting up a secure distributed control system,” Stauffer says.

 

 

 

 

 

For more information, search keyword “security” at www.automationworld.com.

 

Pages

Comments(0)

Add new comment

By submitting this form, you accept the Mollom privacy policy.

Follow Us

 

 

  NEWSLETTERS

Don’t miss intelligence crucial to your job and business!
Click on any newsletter to view a sample. Enter your email address below to sign up!

News Insights

News & Analysis

Product Insights

Latest Automation Products

TalkPoints

Automation Columnists

Feed Forward

Latest from Gary Mintchell

Automation Focus

Sponsored white papers, videos and products

Process Automation

Industry Trends & Applications

Motion Control

Machine & Motion Control

Automation Skills

Improve Industry Skills

Industrial
Ethernet Review

Network Application of IE

Packaging
Automation Review

Trends in Packaging Automation

Safety
Automation Insights

The How & Why of Safety

Each newsletter ranges in frequency from once per month to a few times per month at most.
Feedback Form