Determining which type of controller to use in an automated system can lead to some difficult choices. Focusing on the application and specific capabilities of each controller type helps ease this decision-making process.

The heart of any automated system is its controller. This is where the decisions are made to signal actuators in the system to launch into action based on feedback supplied by sensors.

But implementing a controller requires a series of decisions by the integrator or end user based on the application. A key controller decision revolves around which type of controller to use—a programmable logic controller (PLC), a programmable automation controller (PAC), or industrial PC (IPC).

Nate Kay, senior project engineering with system integrator Martin CSI.Nate Kay, senior project engineering with system integrator Martin CSI.To learn more about the differences between these types of controllers, we connected with Nate Kay, senior project engineering with system integrator Martin CSI, for a recent episode of the “Automation Gets Your Questions Answered” podcast series.

Nate noted that the primary difference between a PLC and PAC is that a PAC is similar to a PLC but with additional features. An IPC can run the same software found on a PAC, but with the full features of a PC.

Allen-Bradley ControlLogix PLC.Allen-Bradley ControlLogix PLC.“PLCs are typically used to control a relatively small number of I/O, analog or discrete, and in a PLC the physical I/O is often tightly coupled both to the programming language and to the PLC hardware itself,” said Kay. “They can communicate with network devices such as drives, but it often requires adding on additional modules to expand their [built-in] capabilities. 

Opto 22 SNAP PAC R1-B.Opto 22 SNAP PAC R1-B.A feature typically associated with a PAC is its ability to be programmed in languages other than ladder logic. “Languages such as structured text, function block diagrams, and flowcharts can be used to program a PAC,” said Kay. “The memory is typically tag-based, whereas in a PLC the memory structure is often address-based. PACs also inherently use standard communication protocols so they can efficiently communicate with a wide variety of network devices. PACs also tend to be modular, so they can communicate with remote I/O, remote panels, and devices like drives. They can also handle complex applications like motion, advanced process control, and integrated safety.”

Highlighting the difference between address-based and tag-based memory structures, Kay said  address-based structures, which can be found in most major PLCs, such as those from Allen-Bradley, Siemens, and Mitsubishi, come with a predefined range of integers, timers‚ or Boolean addresses. A tag-based controller is not restricted to using only the predetermined address ranges. “You can give an address any name you want,” said Kay. “It more closely resembles higher level programming languages like C, where you create variables as needed.”

Kay explained that an IPC can be programmed to run the same control software used on a PAC, but it runs on a full-blown industrial computer; and with that comes an operating system familiar to most end users and the IT department, such as Windows or Linux.

Making the determination

Ultimately, the application should help dictate which type of controller you choose. Kay said, PLCs are well-suited for standalone machines because they're robust and simple, which makes it easier for maintenance personnel or technicians familiar with technical drawings—the basis for ladder logic commonly used in PLC programming— to troubleshoot rather than the PC programming languages often used in PACs and IPCs.

   Learn about Single Pair Ethernet in this "Automation World Gets Your Questions Answered" podcast.

PACs are commonly preferred for controlling larger processes and integrating safety, motion, distributed I/O, and network communications.

You can get a PLC to talk to network devices like a PAC, said Kay, but you often “have to add on hardware modules to perform those type of types of tasks; whereas a PAC is designed to communicate with network devices. For example, PACs come with function blocks that deal specifically with motion and safety.”

Beckhoff C6015 fanless, ultra-compact IPC.Beckhoff C6015 fanless, ultra-compact IPC.An IPC offers the same advantages of a PAC but with even more added capabilities, such as the ability to run middleware. “You can run databases, protocol converters, recipe managers, and even SCADA and MES software on the same IPC you're using as the automation controller,” said Kay. “But there's also a little bit of a tradeoff as well. IPCs typically run an operating system like Windows or Linux and oftentimes those operating systems are not optimized for high performance or deterministic industrial applications. That's not to say an IPC can't be optimized for such applications, but it may take some work; whereas a PAC or PLC come ready to handle those kinds of applications out of the box.”

Ultimately, Kay said to choose the type of controller that lets you achieve the best and simplest design for your application. “If you're looking at a standalone machine, a PLC may be the right choice,” he said. “But if you want to also address motion and safety or controlling remote I/O, a PAC is often the way to go. And if you need to layer on additional features and software beyond what a PAC can do, that’s when you might start looking at an IPC.”

   Listen to this podcast discussion about the difference between mean time to repair and mean time before failure.

Videos from Siemens IndustryView all videos
More in Control