Application Versus Innovation

Feb. 12, 2015
Could the Internet of Things and Industry 4.0 lead to a greater focus on automation technology implementation?

A recent article in the The Wall Street Journal explored the reasons for the demise of Radio Shack. The general gist of that article is that it was not Radio Shack’s inability to keep up with a changing technology landscape that killed it, but rather the demise of Americans’ free time to tinker with new technologies.

Ironically, the free time Americans once had that helped boost Radio Shack’s fortunes in the 60s, 70s and 80s were eliminated, in part, by the very technologies it helped create. The Wall Street Journal article notes how Apple’s Steve Wozniak relied on Radio Shack for parts when he was developing what eventually became the first Apple computers and how Microsoft’s Bill Gates wrote the operating system for Radio Shack’s TRS-80 computer.

So what does this have to do with industrial automation?

I sense a shift happening in the automation space. That shift, though clearly not leading away from innovation, seems to represent something of a slowing in the near constant stream of new product introductions across the board. This slowing does not portend a slow down of the automation industry, but rather a shift toward a greater focus on the application of technologies via Industry 4.0 and the Internet of Things (IoT).

Having covered the industrial technology space for more than two decades now, I get the sense that these two initiatives—Industry 4.0 and the IoT—are forcing the real world application of technologies the automation industry has been promoting for years. In fact, one of the reasons I believe IoT has generated so much interest is that it’s more about implementing sensor, communication/networking, safety, and associated digital production systems in an interoperable fashion than it is about any entirely new technology.

One of the knocks on the industrial technology sector has always been that, for all the wonderful talk about cutting edge hardware and software automation technologies, many manufacturers still use in-house designed Excel worksheets and other simple tools to manage production as much, if not more, than they use advanced automation technologies.

You can argue that this increased focus on application is ultimately being driven by government initiatives such as Industry 4.0 and the push toward IoT by the biggest technology players—and you’d be right. But the result is, nonetheless, a greater focus on the application of technologies rather than the perpetual innovation of them as the principal focus of automation companies in general.

Make no mistake, innovation in the industrial sector will not cease or be relegated to the backseat. However, I do believe it will begin to stand on a more equal footing with real world implementations and results.

Just this week, while attending the ARC Forum in Orlando, I saw evidence of several innovative technologies, most notably the new automation products from Bedrock Automation (more on that in another post) that demonstrate innovation is alive and well in the automation sector. But as interesting as any new technology may be, the real test of its viability lies in its application—and not in a few instances, but widely.

As for how this relates to The Wall Street Journal’s Radio Shack article, I think that, just as the tech industry developments fostered by Radio Shack spelled its demise, the automation industry is wise to avoid any possibility of a potential downturn by focusing on application and, as a result, keeping in close contact with what matters most to its customers.

Peter Holicki, corporate vice president at Dow Chemical, stated it best in his keynote at the ARC Forum: The only technology applications he’d ever seen succeed were those in which the technology was clearly aligned with the business strategy. Building off of Holicki’s statement, the lesson from Radio Shack could well be that the law of unintended consequences can create an outcome for your business that is likely to be quite different from anything you could possibly envision.

Since no one has a crystal ball, all anyone can do is focus on what matters. And successful applications are what matters to the automation technology industry.

About the Author

David Greenfield, editor in chief | Editor in Chief

David Greenfield joined Automation World in June 2011. Bringing a wealth of industry knowledge and media experience to his position, David’s contributions can be found in AW’s print and online editions and custom projects. Earlier in his career, David was Editorial Director of Design News at UBM Electronics, and prior to joining UBM, he was Editorial Director of Control Engineering at Reed Business Information, where he also worked on Manufacturing Business Technology as Publisher. 

Sponsored Recommendations

Measurement instrumentation for improving hydrogen storage and transport

Hydrogen provides a decarbonization opportunity. Learn more about maximizing the potential of hydrogen.

Learn About: Micro Motion™ 4700 Config I/O Coriolis Transmitter

An Advanced Transmitter that Expands Connectivity

Learn about: Micro Motion G-Series Coriolis Flow and Density Meters

The Micro Motion G-Series is designed to help you access the benefits of Coriolis technology even when available space is limited.

Micro Motion 4700 Coriolis Configurable Inputs and Outputs Transmitter

The Micro Motion 4700 Coriolis Transmitter offers a compact C1D1 (Zone 1) housing. Bluetooth and Smart Meter Verification are available.