Cobot Gripper Helps Automate Hydraulic Manifold Production

Jan. 13, 2021
Use of a collaborative robot and gripper at Tomenson Machine Works leads to a 40% reduction in misloads and return on investment in six months.

The implementation of a collaborative robot with a flexible gripper at Tomenson Machine Works in West Chicago, Ill., is a prime example of how small to mid-sized manufacturers are embracing some of the newest automation advances and reaping their cost saving benefits.

Tomenson Machine Works is a third generation, family-owned manufacturer of hydraulic manifolds (which regulate fluid flow between pumps, actuators, and other components in a hydraulic system). Considering the difficulties the company faced in staffing positions to handle its most repetitive tasks, Tomenson decided to automate the engraving of parts in its pin stamper with a U3 collaborative robot from Universal Robots, outfitted with an RG6 gripper from OnRobot.

Kristian Hulgard, general manager – Americas at OnRobot, said Tomenson is a typical customer for OnRobot, i.e., a small company that had never really automated before. “But once they saw how cobots were installed and work, they quickly took steps to install a robot with a flexible gripper to automate the process of numbering metal manifold blocks,” he said.

The collaborative aspect of the robot and gripper was a major deciding factor for Tomenson. “We knew we were not going to get a gripper robot that might need guarding because we're working in a tight environment,” said Alex Roake, operations manager at Tomenson. After conducting a risk assessment, it was determined that the robot arm and gripper could be placed on the line without safety guarding.

“The reason we chose pin stamping for our first application with robotics is because we saw it as basically the easiest and the most repetitive task on the production floor,” said Roake. “We like the OnRobot gripper for this application because we have many different part sizes and we knew that the RG6 could handle our biggest parts and our smallest parts going into the pin stamp."

According to OnRobot, the RG6 can handle parts from ½-inch to 4 inches in size.

Roake explained that Tomenson programs the RG6 using the same lines of code for each part. “We start at the largest size the gripper can handle and then close it until it senses that it's closed around the part,” he said. “Programming the pin stamp is much harder than programming the gripper,” he added.

Currently, Tomenson has 20 to 30 different part numbers programmed into the RG6, with plans to run up to 100 different part numbers with the gripper. The company uses a 3D printer to print its own gripper pads for handling its larger manifold parts. Switching grippers to handle different parts takes between 5 and 10 minutes, according to Roake.

Manufacturing small blocks for hydraulic manifolds produced low margins for Tomenson before the implementation of the cobot and gripper. “Now when we see a small block order, we're not afraid to quote it because we know that the handling of thousands and thousands of these will be done by the robot,” said Roake. “This allows us to focus on the more complex and longer cycle blocks that need more attention.” 

Since the introduction of the cobot and gripper into the pin stamping application, Zach Roake, quality and post-production manager at Tomenson, said the company has seen

“about a 40% reduction in misloads” caused by engraving the wrong side of the block or engraving in the wrong direction. “We’re calculating that we can now run our gripper on first and second shift to get a return on investment in roughly 6 to 7 months.” 

Roake added that “everyone loves working with the cobot. We have employees bringing up other applications we could use the gripper on in post-production, shipping, or even loading the CNC machines.”

Because the cobot arm and gripper can run unattended for around 45 minutes, Tomenson can use the same person to run the line saw and the cobot, rather than needing two people for these operations. Roake said that the company’s previous pin stamp operator was “moved to a different department where she was able to do more meaningful work.”

About the Author

David Greenfield, editor in chief | Editor in Chief

David Greenfield joined Automation World in June 2011. Bringing a wealth of industry knowledge and media experience to his position, David’s contributions can be found in AW’s print and online editions and custom projects. Earlier in his career, David was Editorial Director of Design News at UBM Electronics, and prior to joining UBM, he was Editorial Director of Control Engineering at Reed Business Information, where he also worked on Manufacturing Business Technology as Publisher. 

Sponsored Recommendations

Why Go Beyond Traditional HMI/SCADA

Traditional HMI/SCADAs are being reinvented with today's growing dependence on mobile technology. Discover how AVEVA is implementing this software into your everyday devices to...

4 Reasons to move to a subscription model for your HMI/SCADA

Software-as-a-service (SaaS) gives you the technical and financial ability to respond to the changing market and provides efficient control across your entire enterprise—not just...

Is your HMI stuck in the stone age?

What happens when you adopt modern HMI solutions? Learn more about the future of operations control with these six modern HMI must-haves to help you turbocharge operator efficiency...