Robot Grippers Adapt to 3D Printing and Injection Molding Influences

Dec. 2, 2021

Arburg, a manufacturer of injection molding machines, develops a robot gripper that can gently remove injection-molded parts with complex geometries without damaging the surface.

David Greenfield, editor in chief

The 3D-printed gripper attached to the robot arm is designed to remove specially designed injection molded parts. Source: Arburg

To mimic the dexterity of human hands, robot grippers have undergone significant advancements to pick and place a variety of products ever more deftly. Many of these advances were based on giving robot grippers a softer touch when it comes to moving fruits, baked goods, and other less-rigid materials.

But what about injection-molded and 3D-printed parts and components with complex geometries or smooth and less angular products that may not have a surface area suitable for picking by existing grippers? With the rise in custom part production accelerating with the wide availability of 3D printers, this is an increasingly common issue facing part manufacturers.

Adding to this, in many injection-molding processes, parts fall out of the injection molding machine into a catch pan. While this is fine for many parts, those with curved forms can be damaged by this drop.

Another issue that must be managed by robot grippers in such applications is the separation of the sprues (through which the molten plastic flows into the mold) from the parts.

Read about robotic grippers that don't require connections to factory compressed air systems.

Arburg, a manufacturer of machines for plastics processing based in Lossburg, Germany, faced these issues during development of a new plastic part—an arched handle—for the company’s ThermoLift dryer and conveyor equipment used to handle the plastic granules used in injection molding. The main production challenges for this handle included a requirement that it be positioned at a 15 degree angle in the mold and it needed to be free from aesthetic defects.

Molded part (left) and additively manufactured gripper. Source: Arburg

To automate production of this part, Arburg needed a method of removing the part from the injection mold that would not damage it and which could address the removal of the sprue from the part. Complicating this challenge is the fact that there is little space between the two mold halves—meaning there is no flat surface available for a traditional gripper with a suction cup to make contact.

The gripper with expanded TPU membrane can remove the molded part. Source: Arburg

Arburg decided to address these problems in-house by creating a custom gripper for its MultiLift robotic system. To do this, the company used its Arburg Plastic Freeforming (APF) process to manufacture an application-specific gripper that can remove injection molded parts with complex geometries gently, without marring their surface. Arburg accomplished this by combining a hard housing with a soft membrane, which is connected directly to the robot arm.

The gripper features a form-closure grip mechanism inside a thermoplastic polyurethane membrane, as well as a hard housing made of a polycarbonate/acrylonitrile-butadiene-styrene copolymer. The gripper operates by making the soft membrane expand via the introduction of compressed air into the gripper’s ducts, while the hard housing ensures the gripper retains its shape.

The APF process delivers tiny droplets of material and positions them on a part carrier so the material being deposited maintains maximum mechanical strength. According to Arburg, this ability to combine multiple materials is unique and gives designers the freedom to create 3D-printed parts with both rigid and flexible characteristics.

About the Author

David Greenfield, editor in chief | Editor in Chief

David Greenfield joined Automation World in June 2011. Bringing a wealth of industry knowledge and media experience to his position, David’s contributions can be found in AW’s print and online editions and custom projects. Earlier in his career, David was Editorial Director of Design News at UBM Electronics, and prior to joining UBM, he was Editorial Director of Control Engineering at Reed Business Information, where he also worked on Manufacturing Business Technology as Publisher.