Return on Automation, A Tale of Three Companies (sidebar)

April 1, 2004
Adapt Your Accounting Practices To Exploit Automation

Garbage in, garbage out is a maxim in computer science that accountants should heed. The conventional methods of preparing annual budgets and measuring profitability are responsible for generating quite a bit of garbage in today’s economic and technological climate. The reason is that the budgets and forecasts prepared the conventional way not only rely on the previous year’s costs, but also assume static conditions.

Because these assumptions are becoming less valid in the global economy, companies should abandon the practice of basing the budgets and forecasts on last year’s costs. “Market conditions have become so dynamic that you are not doing yourself a favor by continuing to use old costs for calculating your profitability,” explains Andy Chatha, president, ARC Advisory Group Inc., Dedham, Mass. “You really ought to start using what we call real-time accounting, based on real-time costs.” He advocates using current costs as they fluctuate throughout the year to make decisions.

The necessary information is available in most automated facilities that are using modern data acquisition and computing systems. Converting to real-time accounting is just a matter of programming the existing infrastructure. The initial foray needn’t be elaborate. “You can start doing some of these calculations in a spreadsheet,” says Chatha. “Then you could make it more complex as you learn.”

Although a number of companies have begun using the accounting technique and have reported favorable results, the number is still too small to suit Chatha. For this reason, his organization has based its Real-time Performance Management practice on the technique.

See the story that goes with this sidebar: Return on Automation, A Tale of Three Companies

About the Author

James R. Koelsch, contributing writer | Contributing Editor

Since Jim Koelsch graduated from college with a bachelor’s degree in chemical engineering, he has spent more than 35 years reporting on various kinds of manufacturing technology. His publishing experience includes stints as a staff editor on Production Engineering (later called Automation) at Penton Publishing and as editor of Manufacturing Engineering at the Society of Manufacturing Engineers. After moving to freelance writing in 1997, Jim has contributed to many other media sites, foremost among them has been Automation World, which has been benefiting from his insights since 2004.

Sponsored Recommendations

Why Go Beyond Traditional HMI/SCADA

Traditional HMI/SCADAs are being reinvented with today's growing dependence on mobile technology. Discover how AVEVA is implementing this software into your everyday devices to...

4 Reasons to move to a subscription model for your HMI/SCADA

Software-as-a-service (SaaS) gives you the technical and financial ability to respond to the changing market and provides efficient control across your entire enterprise—not just...

Is your HMI stuck in the stone age?

What happens when you adopt modern HMI solutions? Learn more about the future of operations control with these six modern HMI must-haves to help you turbocharge operator efficiency...