Rethinking Manufacturing in America

May 3, 2013
We thought our job was just to innovate and not actually make the stuff. It’s time to think again.

It was all a part of the plan. We were a manufacturing powerhouse, sure, but it was our destiny to move past such mundane realities. Naturally, we’d want to move into higher-level pursuits. “We could spend less time worrying about manufacturing, and that was a good thing,” said Ron Bloom, vice chairman of U.S. investment banking at Lazard, a financial advisory and asset management firm. “It would relieve us of work we didn’t want to do.”

That was the plan. For some 30 years, the decline in manufacturing in the United States was not only economically driven, but also politically supported. “But in the past few years, there’s been a pretty fundamental rethink,” Bloom noted.

Bloom gave a presentation about the political economy of manufacturing recently during a web event called “America’s New Manufacturing,” hosted by Siemens (www.usa.siemens.com/industry) and the Washington Post. In his presentation, Bloom painted a picture not only of how manufacturing has evolved over the past several years in this country, but he also gave some insight into how it might be strengthened again.

He said that during manufacturing’s decline in the U.S., the financial economy has been overweighted, and the real economy has been undervalued. What’s considered the “real economy” is a lot bigger than just manufacturing, he noted, but manufacturing does factor into it.

Part of the problem with creating an economy that is not rooted in manufacturing is that we are still built around a society that perceives manufacturing prowess as overall strength. “The politics around manufacturing, I think, have kind of coincided with people’s anxiety about America’s place in the world—who we are and what we are as a nation,” Bloom explained. “The strength of the manufacturing sector has come to symbolize the strength of the country.”

Ask Americans if the U.S. is No. 1 in manufacturing, and they’ll overwhelmingly say no. People perceive China as that powerhouse now because…well…they make everything, right? Wrong. We’re actually still the top producer, as it turns out. “There’s a pretty direct line between China being perceived as a global manufacturer and being seen as global superpower,” Bloom added.

The U.S. has long been seen as a highly innovative and entrepreneurial culture. I’ve been covering manufacturing from a very global perspective for more than 20 years, and around the world, that has been the perception. At one point based in Hong Kong covering primarily Asian activities, I remember somebody in industry explaining to me that the U.S. was good at inventing, but it was Japan that could turn it into a marketable product, and lower-cost countries like China or Malaysia that could actually get it made. That’s just the way it was.

But that was OK. “For a long time, we said that what America needs to do, what we’re good at, is innovation,” Bloom said. “We’ll invent stuff here and make stuff there.”

But it turns out there’s an interconnectivity between innovation and manufacturing, and people are beginning to understand that. “The thinking and the making are not entirely different processes,” Bloom explained. “If we lose the manufacturing, then the innovation goes with it.”

We’ve been hearing more and more about a U.S. return to manufacturing; about how it doesn’t make as much economic sense to manufacture abroad. Wages are going up in developing countries, and energy is getting less expensive here with the boom in shale gas. “It takes about one man-hour to make a ton of steel. There’s no economics anymore in making steel any place but America,” Bloom noted.

But it’s just as important that we not oversell it any more than undersell it, Bloom added. The jobs gap in America today is very large, for example, and manufacturing jobs are not going to fill that gap. We’re not talking about manufacturing solving all the country’s problems.

Still, a single manufacturing job holds more value than other types of jobs because it brings other jobs along with it. “Manufacturing can lead, and so this focus on manufacturing is logical because it drives more economic activity than other things,” Bloom said.

About the Author

Aaron Hand | Editor-in-Chief, ProFood World

Aaron Hand has three decades of experience in B-to-B publishing with a particular focus on technology. He has been with PMMI Media Group since 2013, much of that time as Executive Editor for Automation World, where he focused on continuous process industries. Prior to joining ProFood World full time in late 2020, Aaron worked as Editor at Large for PMMI Media Group, reporting for all publications on a wide variety of industry developments, including advancements in packaging for consumer products and pharmaceuticals, food and beverage processing, and industrial automation. He took over as Editor-in-Chief of ProFood World in 2021. Aaron holds a B.A. in Journalism from Indiana University and an M.S. in Journalism from the University of Illinois.

Companies in this Article

Sponsored Recommendations

Meet our experts - Reduce complexity of a DCS Migration

Sign up for a complementary onsite assessment.

Revolutionizing Germany’s energy landscape: The Wilhelmshaven floating LNG terminal

The German LNG terminal lays the groundwork for future sustainable energy initiatives. Here's how Schneider Electric helped make it happen.

Navigating Distributed Control Systems Migration

Navigating Distributed Control System (DCS) migrations doesn't have to be as complex as it seems. Whether you are planning a migration or seeking to enhance ...

Revolutionize process safety with Tricon CX V12

The most versatile TÜV certified safety instrumented system. One system with a choice of architectures and form factors delivering a lifetime of safe, resili...