OMAC Committees Focus On Streamlining Standard

Dec. 10, 2012
A recent meeting of the OMAC Packaging Working Group’s PackML and PackSpec committees concentrated on clarifying and simplifying its standard to bolster increased acceptance and use of the standard by OEMs and end users.

Last week I was invited by John Kowal, director of business development at B&R Industrial Automation and an OMAC board member, to sit in during a portion of the OMAC Packaging Working Group’s PackML and PackSpec committee meetings at B&R Industrial Automation’s U.S. headquarters in Roswell, Ga. The meetings were largely focused on reviewing specific sections of the OMAC standard to better clarify the language in the standard to help make it more immediately beneficial to industry. As a result, much of what I saw focused on the specifics of ISA-TR88.00.02, the standard concerned with machine and unit states for batch manufacturing plants and batch control. Attention was also paid to the most used PackTags, to help better convey information about these tags to industry to improve implementation of the standard.

Following last week’s meeting to foster agreement on updates and clarifications to the standard, the proposed tag revisions will be submitted to ISA and a minimum tag list will be published in an OMAC implementation guide. The Packaging Working Group plans to present the changes arrived at in this meeting for ratification at the annual OMAC meeting, held in conjunction with the ARC Automation Forum, February 11-14, 2013, in Orlando, Fla.

The role of the PackSpec group during these meetings is to “harmonize its specification document with the PackML revisions,” says Kowal. In addition to the recommended TR88 changes to be presented at the next meeting, the PackSpec group plans to present its specification template to beta test the specification with an end user and OEM, and to develop a test protocol. 

Further discussions at the meeting last week involved the teams’ goal to outline a five year plan to present to OMAC Packaging Workgroup leadership. This plan is expected to address TR88 revisions, education activities, a modular programming template, and harmonization with the Weihenstephan protocol. The PackSpec team also cited the development of a software compliance tool for PackML as a specific future goal for the group.

About the Author

David Greenfield, editor in chief | Editor in Chief

David Greenfield joined Automation World in June 2011. Bringing a wealth of industry knowledge and media experience to his position, David’s contributions can be found in AW’s print and online editions and custom projects. Earlier in his career, David was Editorial Director of Design News at UBM Electronics, and prior to joining UBM, he was Editorial Director of Control Engineering at Reed Business Information, where he also worked on Manufacturing Business Technology as Publisher. 

Sponsored Recommendations

Food Production: How SEW-EURODRIVE Drives Excellence

Optimize food production with SEW-EURODRIVE’s hygienic, energy-efficient automation and drive solutions for precision, reliability, and sustainability.

Rock Quarry Implements Ignition to Improve Visibility, Safety & Decision-Making

George Reed, with the help of Factory Technologies, was looking to further automate the processes at its quarries and make Ignition an organization-wide standard.

Water Infrastructure Company Replaces Point-To-Point VPN With MQTT

Goodnight Midstream chose Ignition because it could fulfill several requirements: data mining and business intelligence work on the system backend; powerful Linux-based edge deployments...

The Purdue Model And Ignition

In the automation world, the Purdue Model (also known as the Purdue reference model, Purdue network model, ISA 95, or the Automation Pyramid) is a well-known architectural framework...