This fault tree, based on ISO 13849-1, provides a model that can be used by a risk assessment team to determine the safety category required on a particular area of a machine. Banner Engineering’s Ray Butler advises that the team look at all sides of the machine. The front of a machine may have frequent access by the operator for loading and unloading. The rear of the machine may have infrequent access for cleaning or routine maintenance and should not be overlooked when determining risks.
The risk categories are located at the top of the matrix. Reading the tree from the left, there are two possibilities for severity of potential injury—slight or serious—which lead to two main branches. If slight (S1), then category 1 is the preferred risk category defined by the standard. If serious (S2), then next look at the frequency of access to the area. There are two possibilities in the tree—seldom (F1) and frequent (F2). These choices divide the branches. Next, consider the possibility of avoidance, with again two choices—possible (P1) and less possible (P2).
Following through the decision tree leads to a final recommendation of risk category. After determining risk category, then control designers can design the appropriate safety system for the machine.
Shorten project timelines with these hidden-gem Ignition efficiency tips for designing HMIs, provided by Inductive Automation Sales Engineer Reese Tyson.
Get ready for that “where has this been all my life?” moment—over 25 hidden Ignition features await in our webinar. Our experts show how to boost your productivity and streamline...
Advanced software solutions, like those built in the Ignition platform from Inductive Automation, can provide a crucial means to navigating electrical grid challenges.
Unlock seamless data flow across your manufacturing sites with MQTT and Ignition—turn siloed operations into a connected, data-driven enterprise. Discover how standardization,...
