Tactics Vs. Strategy
Giant retailer Wal-Mart Stores Inc., Bentonville, Ark., is working to polish its image by demanding green tactics across its entire supply chain. Even some small manufacturers such as New Belgium Brewing Co., in Fort Collins, Colo., have created C-level positions for sustainability directors. Just as information technology entered the boardroom 10 years ago, green technology pros are finding a seat at the table today.
In a recent report from AMR Research Inc., in Boston, Stephen Stokes, vice president of the firmâs Climate Change Business, has identified the differences between companies that implement green tactics and those that adopt sustainability as a corporate strategy:
Tactical Sustainability
âą Sustainability follower
âą Highly reactive approach
âą Disconnected engagements at corporate margins
âą Reporting and compliance/conformance Level
âą Defensive brand protection
âą Partial competitive advantage
âą Business risk defocused
âą Anticipating some behaviors and trends
Strategic Sustainability
âą Sustainability leader
âą Highly proactive approach
âą Engagement at business process level
âą Voluntary reporting on a range of variables and key performance indicators (KPIs)
âą Strategic brand development/product Enhancement
âą Substantial competitive advantage
âą Business risk minimized
âą Anticipating and influencing behaviors and trends
âą Efficient energy policy
Related Feature - Sustainable Plants Go Mainstream
To read the feature article relating to this story, go to www.automationworld.com/feature-4767
